I am the head of NMR operations in an institute with more than 200 scientists. Physical organic chemistry, in particular its application to biological questions.Ī. Columbia University New York, then ETH Zurich for the last 29 years.Ī.
Professor in Organic Chemistry at ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology). What good are features that sound nice, but are buggy or so round-about to use that they take more time than the result is worth? Can I get the results I need easily? Can we produce publication quality images? Is it fast? Two features that are often overlooked are the quality of the manual and the customer service of the company behind the software. More important to me than a list of features is the usability of the program. Importantly, my students like the software very much and they can be taught to use it in very short order.Ī. It seems superior to MestreNOVA, with better keyboard shortcuts (MestreNOVA involved a lot of clicking) and a better user interface. The workflow is good and I'm already almost as fast as I was under NUTS (the fastest software of those mentioned above). I like iNMR better than all of the other software that I have used. I have used MestreC, Bruker XWIN-PLOT, NUTS, MacNUTS (new version), and MestreNOVA.Ī. Which other NMR software have you used in the past?Ī.
Assaying purity of synthesized materials and identification of products (both organic and inorganic). Synthetic organic methodology, especially catalysis.Ī. Assistant Professor, University of Rochester.Ī. What's your position and where are you working?Ī.
0 kommentar(er)
